Tuesday, April 29th

WEDNESDAY: Be prepared to spend half the class brainstorming or beginning your exhibition visual piece!

THURSDAY:  Email Ashley your revised draft with the rubric at the bottom AND submit evidence of a peer-critiqued draft by the beginning of class for 10 process points
Be sure your draft has the following in place:

• 1,500 words
•  Abstract:Your essay must include an abstract that explains how you are defining sense of place according to the categories of sense of place (what type of relationship and/or community attachment do you show in the essay) and what your environmental ethic is.  Your abstract should include a quote from your essay that best shows  both of these components. 
  
  
• Title: Give your essay a creative title! Center it at the top of your essay.
• Name: Write your name underneath the title.
• Font: Size 12

Starter:

• Copy and paste the rubric to the end of your draft.

• Highlight TWO "Content" categories you'd like your critiquers to focus on.

• Copy and paste this on the top of your draft:
• A focus question for both Ashley and your peer critiquers: What are you most struggling with? What do you think you are missing? Etc...
• "Before emailing this to Ashley for feedback, I must include my first draft with evidence of 1 peer critiquer's feedback (i.e. as additional attachment in email).  I must have the rubric at the END of the document after my refined draft"
• "Highlight my use of elements of nature writing (metaphor, simile, analogy, writing with sound, etc..)"
• "Email my draft to Ashley by Thursday at 8:15 am for 10 process points"
• Save evidence of peer critique and make refinements before emailing to Ashley for feedback
• Is it a min of 1500 words?
• Do I have an abstract?

PEER CRITIQUE PROTOCOL:  Peer critique groups

1. Author: State your focusing question and the 2 content areas of rubric you'd like the group to focus on

2. Critiquers: Track changes on one document together. Focus on 2 content areas and focusing questions.  Also, look out for sentence structure and spelling/grammar errors.

3. Critiquers: Discuss your feedback with the author and ask any clarifying questions you may have.